1400 Hrs GMT London Sunday 20 November 2011. Editor © Muhammad Haque. Today’s [Sunday] [Fleet Street] “papers”. And the “review” of the papers by Sky News and BBC News Channel. The papers failed on the whole to report the world truthfully. The failure was even worse in their coverage or emptiness on Britain. So much injustice goes on daily in “society” that a representative list of the incidents of injustice alone would take up the major space in an average sized and depth of a newspaper. Yet the papers don’t have the news of the injustice. They have token items. And with the OBSERVER [which has been Guardian-ed for years now] providing the sole “potent” item for “contention” by carrying the allegedly angsty letter by “the bishops” about something they call “welfare”, the robotised participants in the “reviews” of the papers performed their ritual roles in making uhms and oohms about the subject. Except the more directly programmed ones who are operated by the many unseen secret agencies that really carry the powers to determine which way society falls or fails. So where do you begin to prove how wrong the peddlers posing as preachers are! Where? How long will the task take to complete a semblance of an introduction to the dissection of the lies? And of the liars? [To be continued]

1400 Hrs GMT

London

Sunday

20 November 2011.

Editor © Muhammad Haque.  Today’s [Sunday] [Fleet Street] “papers”. And the “review” of the papers by Sky News and BBC News Channel.  The papers failed on the whole to report the world truthfully.

The failure was even worse in their coverage or emptiness on Britain.  So much injustice goes on daily in “society” that a representative list of the incidents of injustice alone would take up the major space in an average sized and depth of a newspaper.

Yet the papers don’t have the news of the injustice.

They have token items.

And with the OBSERVER [which has been Guardian-ed for years now] providing the sole  “potent” item for “contention” by carrying the allegedly angsty letter by “the bishops” about something they call “welfare”, the robotised participants in the “reviews” of the papers performed their ritual roles in making uhms and oohms about the subject. Except the more directly programmed ones who are operated by the many unseen secret agencies that really carry the powers to determine which way society falls or fails.

So where do you begin to prove how wrong the peddlers posing as preachers are! Where? How long will the task take to complete a semblance of an introduction to the dissection of the lies? And of the liars?

[To be continued]

Advertisement